🔗 Share this article

I possess a few opinions regarding the comments delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player during the US Open quarter-finals. Look – the athlete represents American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. Some letdown would have been appropriate. Rather, Fowler brought up the continued drought of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, me too. But come on. Even if Fritz defeated Djokovic for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, who he has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). He said in press after the loss that he in fact liked his draw, because it offered the chance to beat the three best competitors in the world in succession. He is more than within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match what other person sensibly had the lack of US winners on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing between her and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings starting this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as high as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite delivery and concussive power on each forehand and backhand are sufficiently adequate to defeat most opponents on the ATP tour. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, though, Fritz is often helpless. The last several years has seen the curious rise of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming speed and grace of much shorter men. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a soft shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

Fritz has made a several dramatic, improbable improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded up to fourth place – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and including a declining Serbian, is the highest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the ongoing slump of American men winning grand slams when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best run to the All England Club last four in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that very quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four rounds, a win that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the rallies, with Fritz earning numerous chances to break. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the streak to the brink of frustration. When he eventually did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately produced a horrendous game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to use far too much effort to prevail. Facing set points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to the sky. He extended the contest twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately committed two errors. It was not a choke, in my opinion, only a result of having to hit too many second serves.

The match was fairly compelling evidence that the American is insufficiently skilled to defeat any version of the Serbian, that lost to Alcaraz in the following match and never particularly seem like he thought he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has acquired enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in press conferences, more so than almost anyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, willing to not only say his emotions or the tactic he felt determined a contest, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can share that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to do it,” Fritz told an interviewer in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly unlikely for all other players. {